To answer whether mechanisms for combating the crimes of hate speech in the digital environment are as effective as they are in a real-life situation, the author analyses the international (United Nations) and Council of Europe related bodies’ views on defining what hate speech is and what are the implications to consider when dealing with hate speech online, then the analysis of current legal framework within the European Union (hereinafter also – the EU) and the Strasbourg mechanism follows in order to grasp the contextual framework and examine existing online and offline hate-speech related case-law. Subsequently, the research describes some of the upcoming regulations (both in Europe and on the national level) for tackling hate speech and its use in the online environment. In conclusion, although the European Court of Human Rights take into consideration and strictly evaluate the characteristics of hate speech in an online environment, self-regulation of online intermediaries is the most effective solution to prevent hate speech under the current legal framework.https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/60983Share this:FacebookXLike this:Like Loading... Post navigation Social Media Hate Speech Mitigation Field Guide, Second Edition 2021, Cameroon (defyhatenow) Responding to Hate Speech: Counterspeech and the University (Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law)