Should we hate hate speech regulation? The argument from viewpoint discrimination (Oxford Academic)

Philosophers argue that we have a strong reason to tolerate hate speech because of our democratic values. They contend that sometimes a hands-off approach is necessary, even in cases where hate speech causes serious harms in accordance with our democratic values. They specifically bring to mind the democratic ideal of individuals having the freedom to express disapproval and criticism of the laws that govern them. This essay aims to demonstrate that arguments against the regulation of hate speech are not very strong when examined more closely. Second, we can create a stronger case against the regulation of hate speech. However, this stronger argument emphasizes the need for openness and uniformity in the way governments control offensive speech rather than advocating for the complete elimination of hate speech laws.

https://academic.oup.com/pq/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pq/pqae086/7720702