The researchers collected tweets containing hate speech terms using a crowdsourced lexicon. These tweets were divided into three categories: neither, offensive language, and hate speech. To distinguish between these groups, a multi-class classifier was trained. Analyzing predictions and mistakes showed when it is easier to discern hate speech from offensive language and when it is more difficult. According to the research, sexist tweets are often regarded as objectionable, while racist and homophobic language is more frequently labeled as hate speech. It is very difficult to categorize tweets without overt hateful language. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5148370 Share this: Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation Hate speech and hate-based harassment in online games (Frontiers in Psychology) Two Weeks in Soft Security: Free Resources on Countering Extremism, Hate, and Disinformation, February 2025 (II/II)