Five nations from the Global South—South Africa, Argentina, Colombia, India, and Mexico—were chosen for the current study’s comparative legal research of hate speech laws because of their similar sociopolitical and economic traits, which include stark inequality. The research contextualizes each nation’s legal system, jurisprudence, and critical approaches to hate speech, filling a vacuum in comparative law literature that primarily focuses on the US and Europe. Using a diverse operational definition of hate speech, the study looks at how different jurisdictions respond to intolerance using classificatory, contextualist, and functionalist approaches. In its conclusion, it considers the systemic difficulties in controlling hate speech in unequal societies and suggests avenues for more comprehensive and successful legal measures. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5441195 Share this: Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation SMARTER: A Data-efficient Framework to Improve Toxicity Detection with Explanation via Self-augmenting Large Language Models (arXiv) Relieving Bias in Hate Speech Detection with a Small Number of Expert Annotations: A Prompt-based Learning Approach (SSRN)