Private organizations like the Meta Oversight Board are influencing new international human rights legislation (IHRL) guidelines on hate speech in a lawful pluralistic environment. Influenced by U.S. constitutional law, traditional IHRL establishes a high bar for speech restrictions that is directly related to impending incitement to violence, discrimination, or hostility. The Meta Oversight Board, on the other hand, promotes a more expansive definition of harm by excluding information that lacks explicit incitement or purpose and concentrating on the long-term societal repercussions of hate speech. This development marks a change in global online governance toward more expansive regulatory requirements. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5731110 Share this: Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation Beyond Laws: Regulating Online Hate Through Collective Action (Tackling Hate) New on preventhate.org | Policyinstitute.net, 17 November 2025