By portraying norm violations as less serious, humor can mask the damaging character of hate speech, but little is known about how social media environments influence these impressions. This study uses the Benign Violation Theory to investigate how platform context (humorous vs. neutral), individual attitudes, and content style (humorous vs. non-humorous) affect people’s judgments of hate speech as harmless. In contrast to contextual cues, which had no discernible impact, hilarious anti-migrant hate speech raised perceptions of benignity, according to an online poll of 827 German-speaking social media users (ages 18 to 30). Benign interpretations were more closely linked to personal views, especially social distance. These results highlight how, in online communication, humor and personal conventions can conflate harm and benignity. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15213269.2025.2580291 Share this: Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation New on counter-terrorism.org | Policyinstitute.net, 13 November 2025… Coping with Digital Hostility: How Witnessing and Receiving Hate Speech Elicit Divergent Responses (SSRN)