“Motivated by the lack of annotated data specifically tailoring religion and the poor interoperability of current datasets, in this article we propose a fine-grained labeling scheme for religious hate speech detection. Such scheme lies on a wider and highly-interoperable taxonomy of abusive language, and covers the three main monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Moreover, we introduce a Twitter dataset in two languages—English and Italian—that has been annotated following the proposed annotation scheme.”
Addressing religious hate online: from taxonomy creation to automated detection (PeerJ)
Categories:
Related Post
EU rights watchdog warns of bias in AI-based detection of crime, hate-speech (Reuters)EU rights watchdog warns of bias in AI-based detection of crime, hate-speech (Reuters)
“In a report that based its findings on a 2021 study, the Vienna-based EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) said algorithms based on poor data quality could harm people’s lives.
A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis of Hate Speech Detection on Social Media Sites (Journal of Scientometric Research)A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis of Hate Speech Detection on Social Media Sites (Journal of Scientometric Research)
“This paper aims to provide systematic bibliometric analysis and mappings of existing literature for Hate Speech Detection and to identify the existence of Hate speech-related research. Bibliometric Analysis of Machine
Retweet communities reveal the main sources of hate speech (PLoS One)Retweet communities reveal the main sources of hate speech (PLoS One)
Hate speech is dominated by offensive tweets, related to political and ideological issues. The share of unacceptable tweets is moderately increasing with time, from the initial 20% to 30% by