Negative counterspeech fails because it reinforces the salience of the very ideas or associations that it contests. His solution? Positive counterspeech – a form of counterspeech which avoids the salience trap. I argue that the salience paradigm is ill-suited to theorise the failures of counterspeech. I suggest some alternatives. Further, I show that these alternative paradigms make importantly different practical recommendations – recommendations concerning how we ought to engineer our counterspeech – from those issued by the salience paradigm.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X231167593Share this:FacebookXLike this:Like Loading... Post navigation ICYMI: New Report on Germany’s NetzDG Online Hate Speech Law Shows No Threat of Over-Blocking (Counter Extremism Project) Germany takes on Twitter: Potential 30 bn euro fine? (Middle East Economy)