Driven by differences in labeling, the field of natural language processing research has started to accept the concept of annotator subjectivity. This method accepts the validity of every annotator’s perspective, making it ideal for tasks like sentiment analysis that include subjectivity. The fact that this structure gives equal weight to all viewpoints on, say, racism or sexism, makes it potentially unsuitable for tasks like hate speech identification. We contend that the confusion between hate and offense might undermine research on hate speech and urge that future studies be theoretical in nature, separating hate from its opposite notion, offense.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02268