Hate speech is a problem that is not limited to the internet. Due to the issue’s practical consequences, the majority of countries have created legal frameworks that make hate speech a crime. Different countries have different legal frameworks, which adds to the complexity that internet companies must deal with when hate speech is detected. The authors look at hate speech legislation since the definitions of hate speech don’t provide a strong foundation. We seek legal experts’ opinions on a dataset of hate speech and experiment with several methods, including pretrained models on legal and hate speech data and two big language models (Qwen2-7B-Instruct and Meta-Llama-3-70B), employing pseudo-labeling to enhance our pretrained models since obtaining data for prosecutable hate speech is time-consuming. The study offers insights into practical tactics for preventing hate speech within the confines of legal frameworks and emphasizes the significance of expanding research on prosecutable hate speech. Results demonstrate that legal information in the form of annotations can be helpful in categorizing hate speech that is subject to prosecution; nevertheless, greater attention should be given to the distinctions between the various statutes.https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06144Share this:FacebookXLike this:Like Loading... Post navigation A survey on hate speech detection and sentiment analysis using machine learning and deep learning models (Alexandria Engineering Journal) Cyberviolence against women in the EU (European Parliament)